...
What is your answer for the controversial ending of the book of Mark 16:9-20? The NKJV Bible says the longer ending of this book is original but the NIV Bible says no. Is it because of the different manuscripts? Because NKJV uses Textus Receptus manuscripts and NIV uses Sinaiticus manuscripts.

October 24th 2019 | 39728 views 

The ending verses of Mark, verses 16:9-20, were added. When you look at the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus (biblical manuscripts dating back to 320-400 AD), it appears Mark stopped mid-sentence. Thus the end of this Gospel seems to be lost. Additionally, no early church fathers reference Mark 16:9-20. 

Over the centuries, other texts were also incorporated into manuscripts. These corruptions may have initially been marginal notes which well-meaning scribes included when copying older manuscripts.  By 1516 AD, the date of the Textus Receptus, different manuscripts featured three distinct endings to the book of Mark. Erasmus, the scholar who established the Textus Receptus, chose to use the ending translated in the NKJV.

To those who believe in the authenticity of Mark 16:9-20, we would encourage them to consider verse 18, “they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them…” Nowhere else in the Bible are these concepts taught. But Deuteronomy 19:15 teaches, “Every matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.” The Apostle Paul quotes the same scripture in 2 Corinthians 13:1 as proof of his argument. 

Therefore, biblical doctrines should also be established by at least two or three scriptures. For example, the doctrines of Christ’s sufferings and of earthly restitution were taught by all God’s prophets. Acts 3:18, 24 (NKJV), “But those things which God foretold by the mouth of all His prophets, that the Christ would suffer, He has thus fulfilled…Yes, and all the prophets, from Samuel and those who follow, as many as have spoken, have also foretold these days (of restitution at Christ’s 2nd advent).” Multiple scriptures testify to these truths.

Since verse 18 is not supported by other scriptures, we would not act on the basis of these questionable verses.

Related Questions

When a government is against Christians, how should we react according to Bible?
December 23rd 2017 | 39123 views
Please explain 2 Peter 3:16: "As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures, unto their own destruction."
July 29th 2014 | 39165 views
If Adam and Eve were perfect, how could they have sinned? Wouldn't a perfect man and woman have acted in a perfect manner?
September 02nd 2024 | 26850 views
In 2 Kings 20:11, we read that Isaiah the prophet cried onto the Lord, and He brought the shadow of the sun 10 degrees backwards, by which it had gone down on the dial of Ahaz. Does this record teach that the Lord reversed the motion of the earth upon its axis?
September 21st 2023 | 54356 views
Can you explain Genesis 20:12? (Abraham lying about Sarah)
September 22nd 2024 | 24805 views
Hebrews 12:1 (NKJV), "Therefore we also, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which so easily ensnares us, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us." Do you think this verse is talking about those of our loved ones who have go before us and are watching over us like angels ? Or what does this verse mean? (United States)
March 29th 2022 | 73981 views
Should Christians study the Book of Enoch?
April 17th 2026 | 1794 views
What is the key verse In the Book of Philemon?
February 22nd 2015 | 41987 views